I was thinking about twitter and how I'd describe it to someone who isn't here. And I think I've settled on a conclusion: Twitter is a lot like an academic or professional conference, except without the papers/speeches. Just pure Q&A and Happy hour.
-
-
On the other hand, the way followers/following works, you're as likely to see that person 'holding court' and be on the outside looking in, never really getting a chance to get their attention and talk with them.
Näytä tämä ketju -
Meanwhile, the professional back-and-forth of ideas slides between the good-vibes positive feedback you sometimes get a conferences to the snippy, climbing-by-stepping-on-people 'more of a comment than a question' Q&A experiences we've all had.
Näytä tämä ketju -
And the whole thing has that high-school-gossip vibe where everyone (but you) seems to know who we are not-so-secretly rubbishing this week - but if you don't know what the latest is, no one is going to tell you.
Näytä tämä ketju -
Overall, I haven't been around here for long (second twitterversary in May), but I think - much like conferences - the positives outweigh the negatives so long as you can take the time and afford the air-fare, but the negatives are real and can be big downers.
Näytä tämä ketju -
If only twitter would add really good rolling book sales, it would both complete my analogy and offer another point in favor of our crazy birdsite.
Näytä tämä ketju -
...though thinking about it, I said it was without papers, but given the regularity I am writing <Topic: A Thread, 1/47> maybe I am bringing that overly-specific-morning-paper-with-a-pun-title energy here too.
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.