Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
But I am at the mercy of my secondary sources . Pre-spinning prep work often gets just cursory paragraphs. E.g. in Barber, Prehistorical Textiles (1992), spinning gets a 30 page chapter. Combing only gets the occasional mention; it doesn't even get its own subheading.
Gleba, Textile Production in pre-Roman Italy (2008) gives fiber preparation (including shearing) for wool and linen 9 pages, spinning gets 22 and weaving 30.
That's not to bash on those books; they're good books. But you've got limited evidence and limited pages and something has to always lose out and in it often seems to be pre-spinning preparation work.
For my own part, I am endlessly frustrated by the lack of rigorous, scholarly time-labor studies of the complete chain from wool to fabric with authentic period tools. Such data would be supremely valuable, but I've never seen a really complete look published.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
