Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
So, the tricky bit is that ancient artwork prefers to show spinning rather than carding, combing, etc AND most of the preparation work involves tools which don't survive archaeologically.
But I am at the mercy of my secondary sources . Pre-spinning prep work often gets just cursory paragraphs. E.g. in Barber, Prehistorical Textiles (1992), spinning gets a 30 page chapter. Combing only gets the occasional mention; it doesn't even get its own subheading.
Gleba, Textile Production in pre-Roman Italy (2008) gives fiber preparation (including shearing) for wool and linen 9 pages, spinning gets 22 and weaving 30.
That's not to bash on those books; they're good books. But you've got limited evidence and limited pages and something has to always lose out and in it often seems to be pre-spinning preparation work.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
