Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Quite so (though I anticipate such scrutiny by someone academically versed in the era with dread and fascination!). I cut my teeth on EU4, however, and I think this manner of appraisal serves well to inform our design decisions and continue innovating.
Yeah - EU4 is a lot more careful in its historical approach, I'd say, than EU3 or Vicky2 was (warning: I am one of those people who would celebrate in the streets if Vicky3 was announced) and Imperator actually includes devastation and population loss as key mechanics.
Though I might have built the social pyramid a little differently. It can obscure differences in social structure between different regions (e.g. Mesopotamian serfs, like the mushkenum of the Code of Hammurabi, get lumped in with Greek and Roman chattel slaves)
And because each pop type - for understandable design reasons - does different things, it pushes the player to reproduce a Late-Roman-Republic social system, which I think obscures that other systems were possible (freeholding farmers rather than latifundia, for instance)
Aye, I feel that population representation is a good way to add some level of cause/effect to state level decision-making. It's always a challenge to balance the human narrative in a game dominated by strategic choices.
I bought EU3 played it once and quit... I couldn't get over how European dominance wasn't an emergent property. Rather it was ensured by culture group modifier to research. Western Europe 100% Eastern Europe 90% Muslim 80% Indian 50% Chinese 40% African 20% American 10%
Oh dear, playing an "uncivilized nation" in Victoria 2 was so brutal. You basically only existed to get a protectorate war declared on you.
It depends. Vic2 is all about pops, so your potential is dictated by accepted cultures. As Japan, you're almost guaranteed to achieve GP status at some point due to their high literacy. As China, after facing a tough early-mid game, you can become an absolute monstrosity. 1/2
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
