I attended a discussion with NELC folks about how many BIPOC students interested in Egyptology don't do it in Egyptology departments, they do it in African Studies programs (vel sim.), and the discussion was focused around trying to get those students into NELC programs (cont)
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @debscavator ja @DimitriNakassis
But what's the point? If they're doing good work on these subjects and they're in departments where they feel empowered and they feel like their voices matter and are heard, why would they have any incentive to invest in a particular department... (cont)
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 7 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @debscavator ja @DimitriNakassis
...that needs to be reformed? I feel similarly about Classics. Why would people doing great work on these other subjects come into a Classics department if they have fewer struggles for belonging in other fields? I know why classicists want more diversity within our discipline...
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 9 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @debscavator ja @DimitriNakassis
...I just struggle to understand what service we do for students to encourage them to do their work in a field that is or at least is potentially hostile to them?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 8 tykkäystä
I think this is a really important point. In practice, the answer in a lot of cases has to be 'access to resources' - the privileged position of classics has left it with relatively more institutional resources than other fields. But that means redirecting those resources.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.