We did not need another branch of the armed services and the funding it requires. Laughing it off was a polite dismissal, I would have been much harsher.
-
So, I actually think we probably did need another branch of the armed services to cover the 'space domain,' but the real problem is the conversation we're not having about how we prioritize security issues given limited resources. Instead, our strategy remains 'do everything.'
The problem with leaving it to the other branches are twofold, first the issue of communicating between closely related functions in two branches that would otherwise be in completely different org charts and second, the issue of resource prioritization in branches that...
-
-
...consider themselves to have very different missions. Convincing an Air Force that still sees itself being about fast jets and big bombs to invest more heavily into space (mostly in the form of guys at computers trying to keep satellites from being hacked) is a hard sell.
-
Honestly, I think the Space Force makes more sense than the Air Force, since the 'space domain' is more clearly separated than the operation of the army and the Air Force - the latter of which continues to justify itself on the promise of victory achieved entirely by...
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.