Or any historians! The history departments I've been in haven't had catastrophic enrollment problems, even for non-military classes. Even when both university and political leaders pound the 'all STEM, all the time' culture drum continually. https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1356316520973033473 …
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.Näytä tämä ketju
-
Now, the total number of majors is a different story but: 1) Non-history majors should know some history too! and 2) a lot of that is driven by inaccurate assumptions students have about the relative earning power of various degrees.
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 19 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
3) There were unsustainably too many new History PhD's anyways (if only considering academic track, I know Major vs. Grad is different), so maybe current major enrollment is good? (Not sure about history for K-12 education, if that is a history or education major)pic.twitter.com/vyNefJZ0oS
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @ChristoSilvia ja @BretDevereaux
Even assuming a "STEM-focused university", what about making sure that everyone understands context about history of science and medicine?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
And maybe thinks deeply about the ethical and human consequences of change, scientific and otherwise! One of the things that had tripped up our medical experts in this pandemic is that they aren't good at predicting social responses or communication. More humanities might help!
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.