Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
If it's not clear when this playbook was written (and it probably is), conservatives are still claiming this with all appearance of sincerity about Obamacare
The tricky bit is that while Obamacare was somewhat unpopular when it was passed, COVID-relief - the bigger the better - is massively popular right now. So I don't know if this trick will play the way they expect a second time. Fairly easy to call their bluff.
Obamacare, at the time of its passage, tended to poll around 45/55 against, with substantially more 'strongly disfavor' than 'strongly favor.' COVID relief has been polling around 70/30 or 60/40 for, with the energy on the 'yes' side.
I don't think the Rs feel they need very much cover at all to do a complete stonewall though
If the Dems want to pursue that strategy, they should start by not shooting themselves in the foot with the "600+1400=2000" thing Purely from a PR standpoint, hard to pose as wholehearted proponents of COVID relief when they're negotiating with themselves to propose less of it!
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
