...and also non-state peoples in Spain, Gaul, etc. I think we can identify a more-or-less interconnected region, including much of Europe, the Near East, and North Africa, as a functional, useful unit of study (ofc with connections outside to other places!) 5/15
-
-
Do you see Byzantium as separate/distinct from the "Classics" + "Broader Mediterranean?" At least as I learned it (not a classicist), it was basically taught as "Rome fell, and then, there was this weird rump state after." No discussion of how Byzantine empire lasted ~1000 yrs.
-
I would like to see the field of Medieval study come to understand itself as covering not merely medieval Europe but also Byzantium and the Islamic World as a single unit. But I think there are sound reasons for 'Classics' to stop somewhere between 450 and 620...
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Any special reason you don't mention the Hebrews? They were also part of Mediterranean civilization, and can be studied historically without bringing in the Bible or Christianity.
-
I figured they were included by including the Levant, where they lived. So yes, absolutely included in my conception of the field.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Biblical Studies & Biblical Archaeology seem obvious neighboring fields with a large body of (admittedly narrowly focused) existing expertise. It also seems the field of ancient history should be extended temporally, in a longue durée stretching back to the start of agriculture.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
I've seen
@BretDevereaux recommend Abulafia's "The Great Sea" in the past. Dense, but accessible to lay audiences (such as myself). It does, however, cover a much broader time frame than just Classical Greek and Rome.
Keskustelun loppu
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.