Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I'm ok with that, but we need to be honest to ourselves and our institutions about what we are doing an append "for rich kids" to the end of the statement because that's what it means.
Honestly, this may just be my hobby-horse, but I think that's an argument we need to take to the public: for X money, we can have a history-for-rich-kids. For X+Y money, we can have a history for *your* kids.
Do you think that will sway people? I’m all for whatever works. I just feel like that’s not particularly compelling to people, especially to get them to either raise taxes and/or public funding for higher ed (enough that there are more TT jobs).
I’m 100% with you morally and intellectually. History (and all other academic fields) must not be limited to the elite. But to various degrees that’s already the case and the public just doesn’t seem to care.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
