Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
But in terms of where we are right now? (And, I fear, where we’ll be in the future?) It’s both inaccurate and unethical to pitch a PhD as a path to a profession. So let’s right now embrace it for the intellectual opportunity that it is without any claims of academe beyond.
I'm ok with that, but we need to be honest to ourselves and our institutions about what we are doing an append "for rich kids" to the end of the statement because that's what it means.
Honestly, this may just be my hobby-horse, but I think that's an argument we need to take to the public: for X money, we can have a history-for-rich-kids. For X+Y money, we can have a history for *your* kids.
Do you think that will sway people? I’m all for whatever works. I just feel like that’s not particularly compelling to people, especially to get them to either raise taxes and/or public funding for higher ed (enough that there are more TT jobs).
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
