Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I don’t think it’s a dichotomy between a path to a profession and a vanity good. And I don’t think five, or however many, years of good, sincere intellectual work during a PhD is a vanity good. It’s not a path to a profession anymore. If that’s the problem—and it is—we need jobs!
No, that's a fair perspective. I am more reacting to the stance - taken by too many tenured academics - that pursuing an academic discipline is like taking monastic vows of poverty, obedience and stability...little realizing that if there is no money, only the rich can do that.
There's often a failure to walk through the consequences of an 'oh, this is just dues-paying' attitude when you set the dues so high that realistically only the leisured class are going to be able to pay.
Well, my answer to this is more complicated (not that complicated, but more than one tweet). I think that what matters right now is that so few people will get TT jobs coming out of it that that “bargain” just doesn’t even exist.
Oh, yes, that’s an absolutely fair criticism. I think there’s (obviously) the academic jobs problem. But either way we also deserve fair and good wages as graduate student workers. Even if it’s just grad school, it shouldn’t/can’t cater to only the already wealthy.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
