'the founders being slaveholders is a matter of historical context' kind of falls down when several of the non-slaveholding founders (and Thomas Jefferson before he decided he loved money most) were going DON'T ENSLAVE PEOPLE YOU MONSTERS.
-
-
yeah more correctly I should have said 'the ancient Roman world' because a lot of them are Hebrew.
-
Also, seemingly, the Achamenids, though they didn't always prevent their subjects from having chattel slavery, they seem to have thought poorly of it themselves.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Yeah. Cicero's Natural Law discussion drives me bonkers on this point - he walks right up to the door of universal human rights and then just...doesn't walk through it. Lays all the foundation and then just...stops. So frustrating.
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
Even enslaved persons who obtained freedom don't seem to have had abolition in mind always. The Discourses (written by Arrian, but ostensibly the thought of the once-enslaved Epictetus), with a section on slavery and freedom in book 4, pretty clearly has no interest in abolition.
-
Diodorus (via Photius) relates that the previously-enslaved-rebels on Sicily put others into bondage almost immediately to make weapons and enslaved war captives just as any other ancient army. Now that's tricky evidence, of course, since that could just be Diodorus' slander...
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.