Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
...or at a different part, come up with different, but equally valid conclusions. Consequently, I think there is good and valuable history to be written by people whose views and values differ greatly from mine. I want to welcome those people into the discipline. 3/6
And it is a *discipline,* history. Doing it makes demands on you to work with rigor, to work within a tradition of knowledge where evidence is painstakingly assembled and laid out by principles mostly proved and only occasionally experimental to support arguments. 4/6
But this '1776 Report' isn't that. There is no rigor here, no painstaking practice of a difficult discipline that demands careful adherence to evidence carefully documented and open admission of uncertainty or controversy. 5/6
I hope everyone will pardon my frankness, but this report as I read it doesn't rise to being 'bad history' because it isn't history at all. And that makes me sad, because no doubt the embarrassment of this thing will poison the well for other historical perspectives. end/6
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
