It’s always fun to see these takes, which really aren’t wrong (I’ve myself pointed out how terrible Sparta was), based solely on the helmet.
Especially when you know the name of the helmet. @journalismerrrhttps://twitter.com/BretDevereaux/status/1349500689295224840 …
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @th3v0t4ry ja @journalismerrr
The point about the helmet is addressed in the linked article; that it is a Corinthian helmet; that the Spartans are sometimes thought to have preferred the pilos helmet; and that the Corinthian helmet is strongly associated with Sparta in modern political iconography.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 10 tykkäystä -
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @journalismerrr ja @th3v0t4ry
That is not correct. The pilos type (and its eventually related konos type) are post-LBAC types. While Mycenean helmets are often conical, it doesn't seem to be a continuation of the same time.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
It's also probably not correct to speak of the Corinthian helmet being a 'standard.' Care has to be exercised here; the Corinthian helmet is far over-represented in Greek artwork compared to its archaeological preservation, suggesting it was less common than the art implies.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 3 tykkäystä -
In any event, the Corinthian helmet (like the Illyrian helmet) is oone of the older types; the CHalcidian, Konos, pilos and phrygian helmets the relatively newer types which emerged during the late archaic or classical periods.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @journalismerrr ja @th3v0t4ry
Has a lot to do with when you ask. 7th century? More Corinthian and Illyrian types. 4th century? Corinthian is practically a dead type outside of S. Italy, with pilos/konos, Boeotian and Phrygian much more common.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
There is a general trend in Greek armor/helmets towards lighter and less metal-intensive armor-types over time, with the heaviest kit being in the early archaic (c. 7th cent). As you go on, fewer greaves, ankle and belly protectors drop away...
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
...bronze breastplates increasingly replaced by the textile linothorax. Same thing with helmets - lighter types become more prominent as you get later historically.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys
This has traditionally been associated with a shift away from the 'pure' phalanx of the Archaic to battlefields that mixed hoplites and light infantry in the Classical, but that thesis is now heavily disputed by the 'Myths and Realities' crew who argue the phalanx wasn't that old
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.