Is there any historical analog to the Rebel Alliance's X-Wings and their obvious superiority over Imperial TIEs?
Näytä tämä ketju
-
So it might actually be close to something like arming the Mujahideen. Or at the least, like Catholic European powers quietly supporting German protestants against the emperor.
Back in the old EU, there was also a doctrine-based explanation for it, that the Empire *had* better designs - the TIE-Advanced and the TIE-Defender, but chose to mass produce cheaper, expendable designs (Fighter/Interceptor) instead.
-
-
We all know the Empire's obsession with capital ships. "No ship that small has a cloaking device."
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Also, it's not like all of the rebel fighters were secret gems. The Y-Wing is hot garbage, even in the lore, a Clone Wars era design - and not a particularly good one - that the rebels use because it is cheap and available.
-
Which...well, I've been playing a lot of SW: Squadrons, and let me tell you...f*** Y-Wings. It's like trying to drive a school bus through No Man's Land at the Somme.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.