Now I want to change up my tone a little bit because in the first posts I was rather flip and dismissive and I want to offer a bit more intellectual charity here. Now on to 'Episode Six' which is...oh good heavens...which is "Come and Take Them." Because of course it is.
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
He opens by presenting 'Molon Labe' (still being questionably pronounced 'Molan Labe' rather than mol-own lah-bay) as something we absolutely know Leonidas said. Tricky. μολὼν λαβέ does not appear in Herodotus, our best source for Thermopylae.
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 30 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Instead, the saying is reported by Plutarch (surprise, more Plutarch read uncritically). Now while Herodotus wrote about the battle probably around 50 years after it happened (and doesn't include the phrase), Plutarch is writing c. 100 **AD**, 580 years later.
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 34 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Needless to say, Plutarch - who gives no sense of his source and is often willing to rely on hearsay and legend - can hardly be considered reliable at this point. So we cannot be confident that Leonidas even said that thing at that moment (or ever). Not a great start.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 34 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
"A force of 300 picked Spartan warriors, supported by 4,000 other Greek allies..." That's going to be a hard no. Herodotus gives (excluding the Spartans) 2,800 Peloponnesians, 1,100 Boeotians, 1,000 Phocians, 'the full force' of the Locrians, plus the fleet.
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 37 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Plus we know there were other Lacedaemonians (Perioikoi) there, around a thousand. That's no less than 5,900 non-Spartiates on land - unclear why we get no number for the Locrians - plus the (mostly Athenian) fleet at Artemisium (271 ships, c. 50,000 men).
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 37 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Diodorus gives a fuller - but perhaps not more accurate? - accounting and lands at 7,400. So 300 Spartans, supported by c. 6-7k other land troops, supported in turn by c. 50,000 sailors and marines, for a combined operational strength of almost 60,000.
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 34 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
And as Herodotus is quick to note, Thermopylae was *not* imagined as a delaying action. The small force there expected new troops to arrive day by day. The plan - which failed catastrophically - was to hold Xerxes *indefinitely* at the pass.
1 vastaus 2 uudelleentwiittausta 42 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
"An invading army of what Herodotus named 2 million Persians." Two problems. 1) Absolutely no modern historian believes Herodotus on this point. Much smaller. But: 2) He's gotten Herodotus wrong too - Herodotus is very clear about the multi-ethnic nature of this army.
2 vastausta 1 uudelleentwiittaus 44 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Awesome thread, thank you for writing it! As someone who loved Roman history in school but doesn‘t actually know much: isn‘t 2) just a figure of speech? Or were the aux troops of Rome already Romans? Read often "X fielded Y Romans", which would be equiv to Pressfield here, no?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys
In my writing, I always distinguish between Roman citizens, Roman allies (socii) and auxilia. You can refer to them all as 'Roman soldiers' but not all of them as Romans. Some of them are not Romans.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Makes total sense to me! Was just wondering given what I remember from school, but am also translating from German in memory, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Again, thanks!
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystäKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.