Seriously, their "unity" just means "everybody do it my way."
The problem with calls to 'unity' instead of 'accountability' is that the people calling for unity are liars who have no intention of pursuing it at all and have proved that with their actions. Unity would be great, if unity was what they really wanted. It isn't.
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
It honestly reminds me a lot of Confederate talk during Reconstruction.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I find the whole debate a bit unnerving for reasons I haven't sorted out yet. I get the impression that the people that talk about it mean unity in the sense of "lets all shut up, sit down, and be very neoliberal", where the politics is a team sport, not something to get mad over
-
Its similar to the disdain I have for the praise of compromise and such. Perhaps those things are a metric to measure a healthy society, but holding them up as your ideals in and of themselves is like, kindergarten level morality. Or cargo cult politics, at best.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
All wars end in peace, it would be nice if we could all skip to the talking and avoid a war, but I doubt that's possible without a winner. The problem with winning is those that die from inciting rhetoric. Be careful what you wish for. As a historian you should know that.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.