Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I can see modern nation-states not having warriors. Do warriors become warriors because they're born into a warrior class? Or is it being not paid that differentiates them from a soldier?
Warriors do not abide by a structure, is that what it essentially boils down to?
Yes, though perhaps I'd put it more that what makes a soldier different from a warrior is the subordination of the individual to the unit, of the unit to the state. A warrior fights on their own for their own reasons. A soldier fights as part of a unit in service to the polity.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
soldiers
. There is a difference, those words are not synonyms.
