And also, while we're here, the United States doesn't have warriors. Rome didn't have warriors. Alexander didn't have warriors.
They had (or in the USA's case, still have)
soldiers
. There is a difference, those words are not synonyms.
-
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
But to be clear, just as there is no universal warrior, there is no universal soldier either. War, war does in fact change.
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
@Roelkonijn has some good Pressfield debunking (re Sparta) -
I bet! Of course I have my own takedown of le mirage spartiate (https://acoup.blog/2019/08/16/collections-this-isnt-sparta-part-i-spartan-school/ …) though I think
@Roelkonijn and I differ in how willing we are to follow Plutarch; I adopt a 'taking him at his word' approach here to let me meet le mirage on its 'home turf' as it were. - Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
But the ethos or mentality of Romans and Macedonians wasn't the same! J.E. Lendon wrote a whole book on this (Soldiers and Ghosts); it's very good!
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
“Caesar’s legions, or Alexander’s phalanx or the Spartans” he mentions three completely different fighting systems. Three totally different societies and ways of thinking spanning roughly 400 years... I don’t get his thinking at all.
-
Ahh your assumption that he is, in fact, thinking at all.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
His Warrior Ethos book is a compilation of every bad Spartan take out there. Popular in military education unfortunately.
-
Yeah, I've been told Gates of Fire is on various officer-training reading lists and it drives me more than a little bit nuts.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.