As an advocate of new media being a legitimate form of academic enterprise, I have a question for my comrades. If we start viewing things as podcasts as academic outputs, does that mean we then engage with them like a book or article? (I.e. critically.)
Depends on the format, I suppose. 'interview' podcasts with lots of unscripted discussion strike me as more akin to a conference paper and q&a. So heard critically, but w/ a bit more presumptive charity.
-
-
Certainly. I was thinking more along the lines of the "serious" (though others are serious, too) that try to communicate information in a similar way to a book or journal/magazine article. I think they fall somewhere "above" a conference paper maybe? But agree with you on others
-
Well, and a more polished 'documentary' style podcast ought to receive the same sort of scrutiny as other public-facing work, like a pitched-to-the-layman historical book.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.