Of course we build on each other's evidence and arguments. The historian's study is informed by the archaeologist's fresh evidence and goes in to inform the philologist's understanding of their text's context (and vice versa, not a one-directional flow). 11/?
In any event, I find myself much more worried as to if Classics is going to be able to persist as a discipline (ideally a broader, more diverse one) in the long term. Very concerned that we're looking at a significant contraction in support for the study of the ancient world.
-
-
I won't air my full opinion on this here, but classics (and humanities/history/archaeology in general) won't survive as long as the current corporate job-stream approach to higher ed is maintained in the US (or further expanded in the UK).
-
I don't think that the point made in an email circulated on the Kentucky list earlier today is correct in identifying the problem as content. I very much see it as a changing (for the worse IMHO) perception of what a university education is/for.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.