Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Is it just me, or are ancient historians wildly over represented in Classics public outreach efforts? It seems like looking at projects like @AncientWorldMag or @AncientSave that ancient historians are present to a far greater degree than our proportion in the field?
Which is also pretty true when you are thinking in terms of the Classicists who have national or international profiles - for better or worse - mostly ancient historians. I wonder if that's the public-facing nature of the field of history coming through?
I don't have statistics to back this up, but my sense is that Classics as a field is probably around 40% philology, 35% archaeology and maybe 15% ancient history (with the rest epigraphy, paleography, papyrology, etc.)? Just going from conferences, etc.
I'm afraid I wasn't clear. Just because ancient historians are overrepresented doesn't mean archaeologists are underrepresented. There are other sub-disciplines in the field!
In any event, @DrMichaelJTayl1 , I think, made the point with better clarity:https://twitter.com/DrMichaelJTayl1/status/1344640612772048897 …
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
