Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
To be clear, @sentantiq here seems to me quite clearly to be advocating that 'yes...and...' approach to canon formation.
Of course reading time and thus space in the canon is essentially scarce and so for things to rise in, others must fall out.
But I think trying to demolish parts of the cannon is counter productive (not being done here) - often ends up merely diminishing the perceived value of the whole edifice in the minds of the public, with a negative overall impact on the prestige and thus study of the humanities.
I was about to say the very same thing before I read this tweet. But the converse may also be true: as the field shrinks, so might the canon. When there are fewer people who might want to read, say, Apuleius, he gets dropped from the canon. Neither is good!
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
