Squad-sized tactical units are basically a 20th century creation, in armies with rank structures inherited from the 19th
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @applarson
Huh. I would have expected the smallest historical tactical unit to be the company, like the pike square...
@BrendanDawe1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @alon_levy ja @applarson
Company is certainly the oldest unit, but the existence of the Captains place holders as junior officers creates an opening for smaller units early on
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BrendanDawe ja @applarson
Ah, so lieutenants started as deputy captains and then turned into platoon commanders? That makes sense...
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @alon_levy ja @BrendanDawe
Basically how I understand developments over the 19th century, though also note that at the start of the period a new lieutenant likely had no training and would learn basic skills with his unit while by the end he was likely a military academy graduate
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
In the example I'm looking at, a Napoleonic era British unit apparently had its new officers drill with the men until they mastered the skills and could lead them, expecting it would take around 6 months
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
But the standard of professionalism here was somewhat novel, apparently in the prewar army it was common for officers to need sergeants to lead routine drill
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Probably because officers had to be from upper social classes, right?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
@BretDevereaux somewhere discussed how 'officer' vs 'non-com' in any historic army is always about social class, and hence Imperial Roman 'non-coms' could command quite enormous formations because that's just where romans decided that someone had to be of social importance1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BrendanDawe, @3rdDegreeBurns ja
Yeah, sure, but even subject to that class distinction, the centurion was kind of the lowest commanding rank based on bumps in pay...
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
Er, note that the centurion was the highest ranking NCO promoted up from the ranks (or more correctly the centurion primus pilus was). The military tribunes were the most junior aristocratic officers.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.