Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
The thing is, civilian leaders have a very different job then military ones. As Clausewitz notes (drink!) the political leaders manage the 'when/why' of war (the political object) whereas the military leaders manage the 'how' of war (dealing with friction, etc.). 5/14
Addendum: bit of quote, "The political object is the goal, war is the means of reaching it, and means can never be considered in isolation from their purpose…war should never be thought of as something autonomous, but always as an instrument of policy" - Clausewitz (drink!)
Refutation: “War is the father and king of all: some he has made gods, and some men; some slaves and some free.” - Heraclitus (475 BC)
That's not a refutation. Clausewitz wouldn't, I suspect, meaningfully disagree with that sentence. Heraclitus is noting that war is important, not offering a theory of how it should be conducted.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
