And while I hear what you're saying about direct democracy, during this conflict democratic parties and oligarchic parties were fighting to the death. They weren't killing each other over whether leaders led the people or were led by them. The differences were more gross.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @IdiotTracker
Reread the 'How to Polis 101' section of the essay series:pic.twitter.com/Ia2KCAwPlU
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @IdiotTracker
Functionally every Greek polis had the same basic set of governing institutions, be they oligarchy, democracy, or tyranny. The question was *always* the little issues of how power was distributed between those institutions. The gap between oligarchies and democracies was small.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Really? I'm reading your Sparta series now and it seems to imply the opposite.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @IdiotTracker
Sparta is both 1) a unique polis because of the helots and 2) one of the hardest of hard oligarchies.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Do you not get the strong sense from a passage like this that Thucydides loves Athens and its form of government? Serious question.pic.twitter.com/QvDp2tdoWw
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @IdiotTracker
I get the sense that Pericles does; he's speaking here, not Thucydides. There's a whole exciting debate about the degree to which Thucydides' speeches were his own construction or original (he claims to have gotten the gist of the original when he could)...
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @IdiotTracker
...but this is a speech he could have personally attended or had direct, reliable reports of. A fair number of his readers would have been witnesses to the speech. Which suggests it follows Pericles' thinking, rather than Thucydides'
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Maybe. I tend to think that when people were reading it 15 or 20 years or more after the fact, they were probably not fact-checking it too strenuously, and Thucydides probably suspected they would not, as he had just then invented fact-checking.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @IdiotTracker
"With reference to the speeches in this history...my habit has been to make the speakers say what was in my opinion demanded of them by the various occasions, of course adhering as closely as possible to the general sense of what they really said" (Thuc. 1.22.1).
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
In short, the speakers of speeches do not speak for Thucydides. I also make that point in the conclusion here:https://acoup.blog/2019/12/05/collections-a-trip-through-thucydides-fear-honor-and-interest/ …
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.