@BretDevereaux You write that "Thucydides [was an] aristocratic Athenian[]… frustrated that democracy – in [his] view – let the fickle, uneducated and poor ‘masses’ make decisions that ought to have been left to their ‘betters.’"
What in his History do you infer that from?
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
PS: Quote is from Sparta I, tried to leave a comment but the page wouldn't let me.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @IdiotTracker
He says the latter - the 'always grasping for more' of the Athenians and the contrast between wise Pericles and the imprudent decisions of the Athenian assembly (e.g. Sicily) subsequently.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
But Pericles was part of the democracy. The democracy put him in positions of leadership until he died of the plague. Pericles isn't a counterpoint to democracy.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @IdiotTracker ja @BretDevereaux
What Thucydides says re democracy is that they need good leaders, who put the polis first, and don't appeal to the absolute fucking worst instincts of the people in the service of their own aggrandizement. Might I suggest that we Americans should keenly appreciate that insight?
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @IdiotTracker ja @BretDevereaux
And -- with all respect and deference, as this is your profession, not mine -- Thucydides doesn't present oligarchy or monarchy as superior. He stresses that the people who inflicted on Athens their greatest military disaster by far -- Syracuse -- were a fellow democracy.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @IdiotTracker ja @BretDevereaux
He reports how the perpetrators of the oligarchic coup at Athens thought it would help them win the war, but clearly conveys that it hastened their downfall.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @IdiotTracker
Er - more correctly, he flatly states that the hoplite government of the 5,000 (an oligarchy), "the Athenians appear to have enjoyed the best government that they ever did, at least in my time."
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @IdiotTracker
Not that they *thought* they were winning the war, but that flatly a moderately oligarchic hoplite government was itself the best form. Again, to be clear here, the 5,000 probably represented only something like 10% of the citizen class - that's an oligarchy there.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
Just not so severe as the Four Hundred or the later 30.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.