Representational evidence gets a lot more useful if you can say 'X depicts Z event from B lit.source' or 'Z object from B lit.source' but obviously you need to have B to make that work and B is generally doing most of the lifting. 19/
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
3) Epigraphy. Words carved in durable materials like stone. Upside: more texts to read and also unlike the literary texts (which are basically fixed and we don't find anymore), more of these found all the time! 20/
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 33 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Downsides: types of texts very limited. Mostly laws, decrees, lists. Narratives of events are rare. Very useful source for legal texts, but you need literary sources (again!) to provide a framework. But also *very* difficult to read and use... 21/
2 vastausta 2 uudelleentwiittausta 28 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
...often very damaged; typically requires specialists (epigraphers) to reconstruct the text into a form (still not english) that a historian can use. Also very narrow in scope. Very few major historical events recorded in our literary sources can be attested epigraphically! 22/
1 vastaus 2 uudelleentwiittausta 23 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
4) Papyrology (and related branches of paleography): reading texts on papyrus. Good news: much larger corpus, which includes lots of every-day documents instead of just lists and decrees. Receipts, private letters, census returns, fragments of lit. texts! 23/
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 27 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Bad news! Almost entirely restricted to Egypt (and if we add wood tablets, one site in N. England). Unfortunately, Egypt is weird! It is one of the most unusual places in the ancient Med., certainly in the Roman Empire. Not weird bad, just weird different! 24/
3 vastausta 1 uudelleentwiittaus 34 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
So extrapolating from Egyptian evidence to anywhere else in terms of census data, life expectancy, family size, customs dues, etc. is very hard. Lots ?? because Egypt is different and you may not know if it is also different in the way you care about! 24/(to be continued)
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 25 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Otherwise, papyrus shares epigraphy's problems: often need specialists to read and reconstruct into plain demotic/greek/latin, often damaged, lines missing, text missing, context missing. Last part is crucial - say you have a tax receipt, is it typical? 25/
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 25 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Often getting a clear view of that question requires LOTS of examples to get a sense of what is normal. Good news in Egypt is that you have lots of papyrus - bad news is that very little of it has been edited and published. And outside of Egypt...::sad!crickets:: 26/x
2 vastausta 1 uudelleentwiittaus 25 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
I read (can't remember where) that Mesopotamian studies suffers from a lack of scholars who can read/translate cuneiform texts of the various empires. Museums have far more material than scholars who can use them.
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 1 tykkäys
Correct. Egypt is the same way. But it's a lack of scholars - the Mesopotamian corpus is still significantly smaller than Greece and Rome - and over a much larger time period.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
That's just sad. I've been reading Gutenberg publications of late 19th century & early 20th century pubs (guy named Leonard King from the British Museum) and it's fascinating history.
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystäKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.