The same policy, applied in Europe, would be similarly bad news for the Baltic states. And there is an argument there, a sort of every-democracy-for-itself why-should-we-have-to-pay-for-it argument. 15/18
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
But I want the people making that argument to be *honest* about it, that it means throwing many of the world's small democracies to the wolves because no % of GDP spending is going to let Taiwan beat the PRC alone (or Lithuania beat Russia). 16/18
1 vastaus 2 uudelleentwiittausta 16 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
It seems that the great majority of foreign policy experts, of politicians, and of American voters find that unacceptable though. And *that* is why we're pivoting to great power competition, which is why, as
@mattyglesias puts it, we're building more boats. 17/181 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 12 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Anyway, it's a good podcast, worth a listen,
@EmmaMAshford is smart and sharp, I just wish she had given the other side a bit more of a friendly airing, or@mattyglesias had brought on someone to argue the point (e.g.@ConsWahoo who sure does love ships). end/183 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 9 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Well, not entirely into the void - I was listening, at least, although clearly I tend to believe that the PRC has taken most of the non-competition options away from us.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @EmmaMAshford ja
I'm certainly for non-nuclear defensive options to Asian states, but in the case of a pivot away from competition and away from the US Navy as the final guarantor of security, I wonder about the effectiveness.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @EmmaMAshford ja
Just because there's a real gap between the capabilities for, say, Taiwan to hold off the PLA and PLA-Navy inside of the limited time window before US forces arrive in theater, vs. doing so indefinitely in a situation where the PLA-N can block us out.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä
to a degree, I think you are right that you could balance US capabilities with local capabilities - more investment in Taiwanese military capabilities means the bar the USN potentially has to hit is lower. But it seems to me there's only a fairly small space to make those trades
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @EmmaMAshford ja
Anyway, I think it was a really good podcast. And it's important to get the restraint argument out there! I just found myself wishing there was a third voice to push back a bit (or that
@mattyglesias had done so).0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystäKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.