But here is where I want the disengagement doves to be more honest about their position: disengagement almost certainly means selling Taiwan into the same oppression as Hong Kong. It probably means other E. Asian states becoming PRC satellites. 14/18
-
-
We get into a weird space here because not all restrainters are the same. The idea of proliferating cruise missiles to ROK and Japan (not that they really need our help) is fine and all for "realist" offshore balancers, but it's more of a problem for lefty-restrainers.
-
To be sure I think that there are even broader problems with the non-nuclear "let's proliferate missiles" option (mainly that the systems that allow the missiles to become lethal then become the center of gravity, and you're back to square one)...
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
to a degree, I think you are right that you could balance US capabilities with local capabilities - more investment in Taiwanese military capabilities means the bar the USN potentially has to hit is lower. But it seems to me there's only a fairly small space to make those trades
-
Anyway, I think it was a really good podcast. And it's important to get the restraint argument out there! I just found myself wishing there was a third voice to push back a bit (or that
@mattyglesias had done so).
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.