So, my serious question for folks on the fence: at what point does it stop being legitimate legal challenges and start being a blundering attempt at autocracy? After he calls on officials to overturn the vote? After his people knowingly spread false rumors of conspiracy?
-
-
France gave Louis Napoleon a few mulligans on his comical ineptitude. And we can all ask the distinguished elder statesmen of the Second French Republic about the wisdom of THAT choice
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Did they really vote by putting pebbles in a jar/is this a story about vote splitting?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I would personally welcome a Jar Jar Binks granting Trump emergency powers as the supreme chancellor. At least autocracy is an honest tyranny. But my preferred government is constitutional monarchy, under rule of law, with houses set up to make trades. The least tyrannical.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Well, he has until December 13 until he surpasses Gore for challenging a count with lawyers, from a modern legalist/democratic vote perspective. Until the college votes, from a constitutional pedantry [my fave] perspective. I'd love it if it always worked that way. /
-
Based on recent history, he should use money & media manipulation as much as possible to challenge Biden's legitimacy for 4 years & periodically endorse his backers' forays into violent street politics./
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.