Equity is the chunk of something that you actually own, after the assessment of debt liabilities against it. Most often this would be a house. Equity is (value) - (loan still unpaid).
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @PetreRaleigh
In the case of houses, home owners can generally take out new loans (by refinancing) on that equity value, 'cashing out' the equity. It is an important form of emergency or business-start-up capital for the Middle Class which is broadly unavailable to poorer folks.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @PetreRaleigh
And thus a driver of inequality. Basically, you refinance the mortgage on the house by taking a new loan from the bank up to the value of the house (minus some amount), use some of that money to pay off the old loan in one shot and pocket the rest, thus 'cashing out' the equity
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @PetreRaleigh
But of course also extending the terms of the loan. Generally the smart time to do this is when interest rates are very low, especially if you have a fixed rate mortgage, where you can 'lock in' the low rates.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @PetreRaleigh
And now for the Devereaux Family Motto: You should of course always consult a financial professional before making any decisions.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Okay so I just saw a suggestion that property taxes be made payable out of homeowner equity (as a remedy for the displacement of people whose house values have risen until they can't afford the taxes). What would be the mechanism for this? How would you "spend" equity this way?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @PetreRaleigh
I think that would mean that the taxes would be paid in the form of a loan against the house? So, the advantage here is that if you, say, get gentrified out and your taxes spike because house value spiked, then you have big equity because it's value-loan and value just went

1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @PetreRaleigh
So the suggestion is that the taxes would be paid by giving the state partial ownership stake in the house. I have lots of questions there - is this stake an interest-bearing loan? Or does the government expect to get paid only on the sale of the house?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @PetreRaleigh
And for someone in a position where their income doesn't cover tax assessments against the house, I'm really worried about any deal that involves them giving up equity. They could end up taxing away all of their equity and then still have to move, which would be a disaster.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @PetreRaleigh
Taxes aren't a one-time-thing after all. The thing is, for folks being gentrified out, the equity that the value-spike creates can be the seed money necessary for a down payment on a new home (part of the reason renters getting gentrified are in much worse shape).
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
But then also, you can kind of already do this? Like, I know people with income that is prone to significant fluctuation who I am pretty sure have taken out equity (via a refinance) in order to pay the IRS to go away in a situation where the tax bill came in unexpectedly high.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Yeah your guess is as good as mine. Well, probably quite a bit better, given that I didn't even know the load-bearing term in the sentence.
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystäKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.