I can think of no more obvious sign of the abject failure of the current administration than the reports of store-fronts in multiple major cities boarding up because they expect violence after the election. No minimally acceptable president would have brought us to this point.
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Would a minimally acceptable president bring in troops or appease rioters?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @Isthishell1
A minimally acceptable president would not have refused to commit to a peaceful transfer of power (https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54274115 …) threatened not to respect the results of the election (https://www.axios.com/trump-claim-election-victory-ballots-97eb12b9-5e35-402f-9ea3-0ccfb47f613f.html …) and so on, such that civil unrest was a reasonable fear.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 8 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @Isthishell1
A minimally acceptable president would not have have tear-gassed a lawful protest for a photo-op (https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2020/06/08/timeline-trump-church-photo-op/?arc404=true …), would not have encouraged trucks to run opponents off of the road (https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewsolender/2020/10/31/trump-praises-drivers-that-biden-campaign-says-tried-to-run-bus-off-the-road/?sh=5cb2905e262a …) ...
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä
In short, a minimally acceptable president would, by their actions and words, never heighten tensions - as this one has done quite intentionally - to the point that it would be necessary to even have the discussion about how to respond to election riots.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.