Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
So anyone telling themselves that their democracy is safe because "old consolidated democracies" never deconsolidate is fooling themselves.
Self-government is fragile. It was fragile in Athens, fragile in Rome. Fragile.
Handle your democracy with care. This side up 
I should add that I see no compelling argument that modern democracies are uniquely resistant to deconsolidation in a way that ancient democracies were not If anything, wouldn't we assume small, tight-knit democracies beset by security threats would be *harder* to deconsolidate?
Limited info though. Like am web addicted so have scanned your tweets! You a distinguished scholar of the classics, think is correct? Me some Black guy--not that it matters--in Georgia in a mental health program. Knowledge IS power. Access to knowledge is empowering. Woh! Cool!
The longest modern democracy, the United States, had the civil war which seems to have had many of these features. It just got lucky in being able to reverse the polarization after a bad period
It is not a clean example because both sides kept some form of democracy, but there were shifts in alarming directions with things like rights (and a non-trivial number of people hurt).
Democracy is fragile bc it relies on meta-laws of behaviour: ppl in charge must act for good of all, not their own. Autocracies can just use power to crack down on dissent- but too much terror, ppl will rise up bc of it in spite, so it too falls.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
