Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Democratic deconsolidation was sufficiently common that ancient Greek writers theorized about it (e.g. famously Plb. 6.3.9-13). This is a real problem with political theories that don't reach past the modern period - the small sample set leads to absurd 'emprical' conclusions.
So anyone telling themselves that their democracy is safe because "old consolidated democracies" never deconsolidate is fooling themselves.
Self-government is fragile. It was fragile in Athens, fragile in Rome. Fragile.
Handle your democracy with care. This side up 
I should add that I see no compelling argument that modern democracies are uniquely resistant to deconsolidation in a way that ancient democracies were not If anything, wouldn't we assume small, tight-knit democracies beset by security threats would be *harder* to deconsolidate?
Wasn't the Renaissance Republican experience nearly all deconsolidation as well?
Not really my expertise so I don't really feel confident to pronounce on the topic. Sadly, my pocket Italianist colleague is inexplicably still not on twitter.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
