Yes, Kagan definitely saw the light (maybe for personal reasons to do with his children), but Neville is right. Look at one of VDH's crazy op edhttps://www.nationalreview.com/2020/10/trump-vs-biden-a-rundown/ …
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
It would, except that, at least in my experience, that's not what you get if you buy a round of drinks at SCS/AIA. What you get is a lot of people who are deeply unconvinced, but have their own research projects and don't want to waste time rehashing an old debate.
I've heard variations on "I don't buy it, but there's no point in re-writing WWoW with revisions" more than once - often quite aware of the 'Hillsdale College' shade that would go with the effort. Which is why WWoW keeps getting assigned to undergrads, despite its deep flaws.
-
-
Yes, and which is why I keep framing my work as "further reasons you should not assign WWoW to your undergrads." But then my reviewers object. I guess they have never tried to buy anyone a round of drinks at the SCS :P
-
The reviewers are absolutely wrong about that, I agree with you there. What you need to do is conspire to find one good Hellenist to actually do the rewrite of WWoW, as a sort of service-to-the-field so that you have something recent to fight with.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.