Human nature only changes on the edge of the precipice ... In a way, I had hoped he would not be so brazen as before. But eeeeeemmmm wrong again
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
The fact that there has been no new research developing 'orthodoxy' since about 1995, and no scholarly defences of it since 2013, suggests that Krentz and Van Wees' revisionist view has indeed become the communis opinio among experts.
It would, except that, at least in my experience, that's not what you get if you buy a round of drinks at SCS/AIA. What you get is a lot of people who are deeply unconvinced, but have their own research projects and don't want to waste time rehashing an old debate.
-
-
I've heard variations on "I don't buy it, but there's no point in re-writing WWoW with revisions" more than once - often quite aware of the 'Hillsdale College' shade that would go with the effort. Which is why WWoW keeps getting assigned to undergrads, despite its deep flaws.
-
Yes, and which is why I keep framing my work as "further reasons you should not assign WWoW to your undergrads." But then my reviewers object. I guess they have never tried to buy anyone a round of drinks at the SCS :P
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.