I remain deeply confused by reports of professors demanding that students have their cameras on during zoom classes, especially zoom lectures. What's the purpose of making the demand for all of the students? Seems likely to create issues and in some cases rather petty?
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Now, I asked my students, if they felt comfortable, to turn their cameras on during lectures, specifically because it helps me if I can see even just a few faces to gauge if there is understanding or confusion. I made clear that there would be no grade or judgement for this.
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 15 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
And I've had enough students do it that I can get a little 9x9 grid of faces, which works. Not as well as in-person, but it works. And that's all its for (well, that and for the occasional student-pet cameo). But 'requiring' it from everyone is just never going to work...
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 13 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
...just obviously, some students might not have a camera; some students might be working - since they're home now - in a space where it's not a good idea (crowded, distracting - a power outage sent at least one of my students to attend from a Starbucks, for instance).
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 15 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
It's just not a difficult accommodation. Now I know some folks on this birdsite argued for much looser expectations for this semester. That's not me. My assessments haven't changed (except to fit online - more essay, less recall); students have largely risen to the challenge.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 11 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
But when it comes to flexibility and accommodations, my goal is maximum learning. And aiming for the best outcomes (in terms of things learned, to be clear) is almost always the path of flexibility (within reason, mind you).
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 12 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
I wonder how much the inflexibility that some instructors exhibit is conditioned by the elevated strains of academia, the ever-more-difficult (and thus ever-less-forgiving) job market, professional hazing in graduate school, etc.? Seems bad, from an org. culture point of view.
2 vastausta 1 uudelleentwiittaus 14 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
What do you mean by "elevated strains of academia"?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @kroeghe
The job market has been appreciably worse in the 2010s than it was in the aughts or the 90s. Partly as a consequence, the pressure to publish (to get hired, get tenure) is significant higher than it was.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @kroeghe
You can see this in then often radical difference in what an early career academic C.V. (the academic version of a resume) looks like now compared to, say, 1990.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
Bret Devereaux uudelleentwiittasi Bret Devereaux
If you are instead asking about why that is, I've talked about that question here: https://twitter.com/BretDevereaux/status/1295909929228873728 … and here: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/08/why-state-universities-have-no-other-choice-but-to-reopen/615565/ …
Bret Devereaux lisäsi,
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.