That worked! I am going to do the boring thing and actually agree. Armor prevalence is always difficult. Artwork biases towards high status armors and often towards greater uniformity. It's clear that the segmentata was a high status armor.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Well, and its coverage - along with scale - is just better. The segmentata offers no protection for the upper legs or groin - those are areas where a cut or puncture can lead to lethal blood-loss quite fast! Scale and mail cover those areas in most of their forms.
The coverage difference is, I think, why I am less shocked then some that this 'advanced' armor-type doesn't continue into the later periods, especially since it doesn't seem to have been worn with mail. It's just not a proto-brigandine.
-
-
What always baffles me is why it shows up in the west but not the east. If you asked me where I'd expected to see rigid, layered plate defense first, I'd have said the East, against more powerful bows. Obviously not!
-
I wonder if we're actually overthinking it, and it shows up in the west because that's where the local iron production included methods of producing lots of relatively cheap sheet-iron and this was a cost-saving measure for the less dangerous frontiers.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.