Protected tweet (presumably someone who, quite sensibly, as their tweets set to private). I can't read it.
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @Idiotprofessor4 ja @MilHist_Lee
That worked! I am going to do the boring thing and actually agree. Armor prevalence is always difficult. Artwork biases towards high status armors and often towards greater uniformity. It's clear that the segmentata was a high status armor.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @Idiotprofessor4 ja @MilHist_Lee
Question on that: how thick was your subarmalis? Armor that is terrible uncomfortable in a shirt is sometimes rendered more wearable in a gambeson.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
My understanding, and I haven't done a detailed look myself, is that the segmentata is also less common in the East, where we see a lot more scale. But the literature - esp. the English language literature - has a strong western focus, as do reenactment groups.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Compounding that, it's clear that mail was the lower 'status' armor from things like Trajan's column, but trying to figure its prevalence is tricky. Mail is just a lot less likely to be preserved in the archaeological record in a way that we can interrogate or even recognize.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Small ferrous rings just rust away into nothing, or into concretions. And mail is fair more repairable, reusable, resizable - and expensive enough to be worth keeping. Consequently, mail finds from any period, tend to be damn rare.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
Why thank you! I am - very slowly - working on the bookification of the argument. One of these days!
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.