I understand why we do this framing dance on a regular basis but I think "militia" is functionally synonymous with "right wing domestic terrorist organization" in the lexicon of everybody who actually thinks the latter is a bad thing to behttps://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1314359098734006272 …
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @PetreRaleigh
I wonder if part of the issue is militias being mentioned in the constitution and founding history of the US. Militia types probably see themselves as "true patriots" anyway.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @TheOddlander
I'm sure that's why some people see it as a value neutral or even positive term. I just don't know any of those people, lol
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @PetreRaleigh
I dislike the use of 'militia' like this, because I think it's inaccurate to the meaning of that word (militias, I'd argue, definitionally are directed by or represent the state or larger community). But I find the strongest feelings re: militia come from miltwitter.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @PetreRaleigh
I always figured the American use of the word referred to a localized semi-organized volunteer unit lacking in both standardized training and arms. Adding professionalism was part of the process that converted state militias to the National Guard system.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @TheOddlander ja @PetreRaleigh
But the state militia was still sort-of-internally organized. There were ranks, they were responsive to the governor, and they could have federalized, even back before the guard.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @PetreRaleigh
I think, as a matter of definition, that's the key distinction. What separates 'militia' from thugs, bandits, gangs, etc. is state sanction. And I think extending the term to these guys implies that they walk in the tradition of the Revolution.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @PetreRaleigh
And...they don't. The guys at Lexington&Concord were the Massachusetts militia. They had commanders, appointed by colonial/state government. Just like the neo-Confederates don't walk in the tradition of the US Army, these thugs don't walk in the tradition of the Minutemen.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys
These so-called militia aren't the modern-day minutemen. They're the modern day Whisky Rebellion. The actual militia (and George Washington) were on the other side.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.