I understand why we do this framing dance on a regular basis but I think "militia" is functionally synonymous with "right wing domestic terrorist organization" in the lexicon of everybody who actually thinks the latter is a bad thing to behttps://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1314359098734006272 …
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @PetreRaleigh
I wonder if part of the issue is militias being mentioned in the constitution and founding history of the US. Militia types probably see themselves as "true patriots" anyway.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @TheOddlander
I'm sure that's why some people see it as a value neutral or even positive term. I just don't know any of those people, lol
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @PetreRaleigh
I dislike the use of 'militia' like this, because I think it's inaccurate to the meaning of that word (militias, I'd argue, definitionally are directed by or represent the state or larger community). But I find the strongest feelings re: militia come from miltwitter.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @PetreRaleigh
I always figured the American use of the word referred to a localized semi-organized volunteer unit lacking in both standardized training and arms. Adding professionalism was part of the process that converted state militias to the National Guard system.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @TheOddlander ja @PetreRaleigh
But the state militia was still sort-of-internally organized. There were ranks, they were responsive to the governor, and they could have federalized, even back before the guard.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @PetreRaleigh
I think, as a matter of definition, that's the key distinction. What separates 'militia' from thugs, bandits, gangs, etc. is state sanction. And I think extending the term to these guys implies that they walk in the tradition of the Revolution.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys
And...they don't. The guys at Lexington&Concord were the Massachusetts militia. They had commanders, appointed by colonial/state government. Just like the neo-Confederates don't walk in the tradition of the US Army, these thugs don't walk in the tradition of the Minutemen.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @PetreRaleigh
These so-called militia aren't the modern-day minutemen. They're the modern day Whisky Rebellion. The actual militia (and George Washington) were on the other side.
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäysKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.