Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Something which in turn answers a question the video poses but talks about (because it can't answer it): why shift to farming, when it is less healthy overall? The answer is "you shift to farming to get big enough group-size to defend your territory and resources." 5/6
Warfare provides the pressure that forced otherwise maladaptive strategies. This is something we actually have growing evidence for: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228438092_Beating_Ploughshares_Back_into_Swords_Warfare_in_the_Linearbandkeramik … https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0030410 … https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000536 … Good quick summary of what we know in Lee, Waging War, ch1, too. end/6
Coming from an aDNA standpoint: fairly "unmixed" hunter-gatherers (by lifestyle + genetic ancestry) survived in areas of Europe until quite late, living alongside farmers for a long time -- as recently as 3000 BC in Blatterhohle. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6157/479 …https://www.nature.com/articles/nature24476 …
And the hunter-gatherers and farmers extensively mixed and interbred across Europe (see Nature paper above) -- it doesn't seem to have been as crude as the farmers massacring and totally replacing the indigenes. Although, of course, there are ways of mixing that are not peaceful.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
