Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I mean, right or wrong (mostly wrong) the answer to that question is pretty obvious: after the breakup of the USSR led to the creation of many democratic states, the conclusion that many thinkers in the west reached was that everyone wanted democratic governments...
...and that the major obstacle to those kinds of governments (and the relative prosperity and safety they tend to bring) were the existing repressive regimes. So that if only the door to democracy could be opened (by the AC-130), the populace would walk through it...
...forming stable, Eastern-European style democracies that mostly were able to fairly rapidly improve their economies and standard of living (more Poland, less Russia), leading to an overall decline in violence and instability which would benefit US interests in the region.
Now of course, rooted in broader history, that seems silly and a wider vision might have seen that autocracy, not democracy is the 'base state' of government, a gravity that democracies defy only with effort. But the train of logic wasn't all that mysterious.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
