Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I think any incendiary effect would require a LOT of powder. But a narrower tube is worth a try.
That was my thought. Setting wood on fire is hard. And imagine if the wood had been wetted first! But then it becomes a 'what did it do then?' question, right? Because the idea of loading it with projectiles only comes later. Pure morale weapon?
Tonio thinks it was used in battlefield infantry formations. He might be right.
Wow, I don't think I would want to be the infantryman struggling to light the touch-hole in spear's reach in a battle. Would a longer, thinner tube have a longer burn-time? And is that consistent with our evidence for the originals?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
