Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Long conflict between the 'military man' and the 'court/lawyer' archetype of a leader, I think (admittedly Trump & Johnson don't really fit into this, given celebrity is a pretty modern phenomenon, but I'd place Bolsonaro as firmly trying to be the military man)
I know quite a few military men (and a few military women) among my family, colleagues and students.
They are some of the most scrupulous observers of decorum I know (and also @xv40rds ).
I think this is actually the traditional model of adult behavior (with revisions for the modern era) against the fascist model of masculinity. Umberto Eco's famous essay, Ur-Fascism, gets into this point in more detail - but it is a child's idea of a man that fascism fetishizes.
The word now surely evokes Wilfrid Owen's poem Dulce et Decorum Est in which he excoriates the leaders of the First World War for abusing the ideal of soldierly decorum. From another angle (not applicable to Trump's behaviour) calling for decorum can be a form of tone policing.
I don't mean 'military' as in actually in the military, but the macho architype since most of the modern examples that come to mind were military dictators. Obviously stuff like the debate last night was just childish all round
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
