My impression is that all of those things are included in the more sophisticated version of the 'declining violence' argument (but ignore Pinker; Gat, "War in Human Civilization" is superior as a form of this argument).
Previous tweet, I realize, is not clear: your critique is absolutely valid directed at Pinker. Gat presents a more limited and stronger form of the argument which does consider these things and still holds.
But everyone reads Pinker and not Gat because 
-
-
I actually haven't heard of Gat, so thanks for the rec!
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.