Time for @david_j_roth to produce another Working Theory Of What Donald Trump Is Even Talking Abouthttps://twitter.com/AmerIndependent/status/1305849370328403969 …
0:42
Näytä tämä ketju
Obviously most of that is an incoherent garbled mess, but in that garbled mess is a dim reflection of what once might have been a good point, that Oregon and California haven't been doing great forest management (climate change also plays a role ofc): https://www.npr.org/2020/09/15/913128020/west-coast-fires-climate-forest-management-lax-rules-plenty-of-blame-to-go-aroun …
-
-
Thinking about this for a moment longer, I realized that I missed an opportunity to describe this as "the burned out husk of what once might have been a good idea" and thus must now go to twitter-jail.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
How much of that is on the states versus the US Forest Service that Trump keeps trying to defund? Even if you make sense of his nonsense, it's still his fault for not pushing forward policy solutions and funding to make substantial changes (and denying climate change).
-
Oh sure. He gets no credit for an issue he clearly doesn't even remotely understand. My impression is that a significant chunk is federal land, but the most crucial areas (near cities) is state land. I'm not up on the details. Also, climate change clearly matters a lot here.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Sometimes real and imagined policy just happen to coincide
-
A lot of Trump's most incoherent quotes come from him having heard a briefing on an issue, remembering a third of it, and making up the other two-thirds to fit. In this case, he's actually more or less right in the broad strokes, but still remarkably dumb on the details.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.