An idea I hold completely seriously is that the right to reasonable entertainment during working hours should be a labor issue and would meaningfully improve quality of life for employees in a huge range of job types
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Any cashier or employee who sits behind a counter for hours at a time should have the right to 1) sit 2) read a book. Anybody who does relatively menial or on-call work that involves sitting at a computer should be able to stream or listen to music/podcasts. Etc etc
1 vastaus 4 uudelleentwiittausta 16 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Jobs where you perfectly well *could* read, or watch TV, or whatever else, and still accomplish your work - but are forbidden from doing so - are asking you to sacrifice potentially years of your valuable time to management's empty ideas about professionalism or productivity.
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 11 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @PetreRaleigh
My own admittedly limited experience is that most jobs where there is actual policy against this sort of thing are customer-facing. They want to make you stand and not listen to music for the 'benefit' of the customer, who wants to feel like a medieval lord attended by servants.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @PetreRaleigh
That is obviously a hot-garbage way to view your fellow citizens providing you with valuable services you need or want. But it's connected to this issue: companies often want to sell anti-egalitarianism. We ought to shame them for doing so, it's contrary to the American creed.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Right - this should be normalized as a labor right customers have no reason to feel annoyed about. This would form a natural part of a more general reorientation away from assuming that the human subject is always a customer, never a worker
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @PetreRaleigh
Here, I think we run into the differences of our political temperament, because my instinct is to try to change this through voluntary interactions in the culture (shaming and market interactions) whereas you prefer (I assume) state action through labor reforms.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
I think like a lot of lasting improvements in labor conditions this would actually be something that unions win and that then becomes an industry standard/normative expectation of all employers. It might be too granular for state action. I'm not an organizer, this may be wrong
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
Fair. My concern with unions is always that they will seek gains not from bargaining against employers as much as by bargaining with employers against future employees, non-employed persons, or the general public. But no system is perfect, of course.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.